Obama v. Teleprompter and the Prepackaged Presidency
-
Sky News in Merry England tells us today of another tale of teleprompter dependency on the part of President Obama.
Now, I’ve had to recite speeches before. To small groups, to classes
, for training purposes, things like that. Not wanting to be caught completely flat-footed on the podium — especially knowing what stage fright itself can do to your memory acumen, however remarkable it is while you’re practicing solo — I’d refine a fairly strict speech ahead of time, taking down notes of key points to refer to once on stage, expecting deviation in the details of how I present it (pending what feels most natural, crowd reactions, time strictures, and so on). The whole process, to me, was always stressful and exhausting. So I’ve got sympathy for teleprompter dependence in an abstract sense.But I’ve also held onto this crazy notion that perhaps the expectations would shift a bit if I were a company executive, a marketer, a salesman, or — you guessed it — a politician. Run-of-the-mill politicians should be fairly accomplished at public speaking: fund raisers, televised announcements, meetings with unions, presentations before the legislature, miscellaneous luncheons, and myriad other engagements would tend, I would think, to polish one’s adroitness in that kind of thing.
Then you take a guy like Obama, a guy who’s climbed a long ladder of positions to reach the top, who’s lauded as an accomplished orator even among Presidents, who’s regarded as earnest and honest, young and intelligent, a refreshing change from the wooden puppets we’ve come to label “politicians” for decades, if not longer. Is it really too much to expect that the guy with enough arrogance to re-engineer our economy and healthcare speak candidly and from his own mind about those very topics?
As it stands, his rather unchanging, inhuman delivery combined with his slowness in realizing what he was even reading, lends the impression that while the teleprompter is the text delivery mechanism for a speechwriter’s latest opus, Obama is nothing more than the Animatronic component. Are any of his ideas even his? If they are, does he even understand them?
I realize that all of these people have been cowed by the media and its insistent 24-hour news cycle, of YouTube and its merciless parodies and mashups, and of the thousands of blogs that will use any mistake as fodder for another superficial attack. But did we really elect a guy who’s too condescending to think the American people can see past that nonsense, and too much of a coward to bear it?





June 8, 2009 at 1:06 pm
Jeremy,
Why do you not allow long comments? Seems kinda weird for a blog, but whatever, it’s your blog.
Well this is just fascinating. Do you really believe this? Do you really think that Obama is basically, well, retarded, except that he can read a teleprompter? And do you really think that most people believe that?
I can understand thinking that raising the marginal tax rate from 36% to 39% is the end of the world, but this Republican/Fox News fixation with the teleprompter is just weird. I understand it, it’s the “attacking him at his strength” strategy, but do you really think that this is going to lead to the Republican revival? Or do you think that maybe with enough paper cuts, he’ll bleed to death?
I don’t get it. I understand the anger about policy, honestly, but this isn’t about policy. It’s about trying to make fun of him, to denigrate him, to belittle him. But why? Do you think that’s going to stop a health care reform bill from passing Congress? I don’t think so. I guess if it makes you feel better, go right ahead. Do you ever think that the majority of people are looking at this kind of behavior and thinking it’s just a little bit childish? And Obama really doesn’t look that childish, or petty, when compared to Glenn Beck and Dick Cheney and Newt Gingrich and people who obsess about teleprompters.
It sucks to lose, and it sucks to be in the minority, and believe me, I know, I been there. But what if the economy is not completely in the dumper in the fall of 2010? Really, what do you guys think is going to happen? How are Republicans going to come back? Do you think that everybody is going to wake up one day and say “Gee, George W. Bush was terrific”? I don’t think that that is going to happen, and really, if I were trying to make strategy for the Republicans at this point, I’m not sure what I would do. When you add up all the people with inherited wealth and all the people who hate the gays, it just don’t add up to a winning coalition.
Keep going on about the teleprompter, though. It’s very smart and appealing.
May 18, 2010 at 2:12 pm
Salaam,
Well, I guess it’s clear that I got distracted from the blog in the past year or so, since only in the past couple days did i see your response. Sorry about that. You may not even see my response, but in case you do (and in case anyone else does), I figure I’ll get it in here just before the one-year anniversary mark. :)
I never implied that Obama’s “retarded;” everything I’ve seen of him indicates that he’s intelligent enough for the job. Over a year in, though, I still don’t believe he understands the whole of the policies he espouses. But to be fair, how could he? He’s encouraging legislation on financial markets, health care, ecology, food production, employment, the oil industry, and beyond - all fields that generally require dedicated education and years of experience to grasp. Is he smart enough to bypass all that and intuit the fundamentals of all those fields, let alone the fine details and counterintuitive nuances? Not by a long shot. So he depends on advisors, lobbyists, and other “experts” to feed him with information and advice.
Hence the teleprompter dependency. If he were tackling the constitutional duties of the federal government, he wouldn’t need to pretend to be an expert on all that stuff. But he’s assigned himself the commanding role in an epic of expansionistic government, and with it must come the projection of knowledge and competence. He could ad-lib it and end up sounding stupid like George W. Bush (another expansionist), or he could stick to his lines and come to rely on his script like a lifeline.
My underlying point in all this is that he’s not standing up before the people and talking from the gut about things that he a) understands thoroughly and b) truly believes. I get a strong sense that one or both of those aren’t true, and because of his long experience in both politics and public speaking, it can’t be attributed to butterflies. You’re right that there was a lot of juvenile commentary on the teleprompter slip-ups at the time, but I think it’s a symptom of a deeper, and more troubling, reality that’s regularly reinforced in Obama’s policies, comments, and associates.
Oh, and I’m in the minority, but more than you seem to think. I abhorred the presidency of GWB, Clinton, GHWB, and many more in addition to Obama. This isn’t a left/right thing to me, and I wish it could cease being that for everyone.
(I wasn’t aware that my comment lengths are limited; must be a default. I’ll check it out, thanks.)